JazzByTheBay
08-01 08:48 PM
You can call USCIS if you don't hear from them within 90 days of filing EAD. Many of you probably know this already, but I thought that was interesting... and may benefit those who didn't know this already.
jazz
If Your Case Is Outside Our Current Processing Time (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=66f70531eaa9e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=a9243529fdb7e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190a RCRD)
If you filed a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, and it has been longer than 90 days since you filed and you haven't gotten an update from us within the last 60 days, and have not seen any public notice that addresses your case type, please don't wait the extra 30 days. Call customer service immediately.
jazz
If Your Case Is Outside Our Current Processing Time (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=66f70531eaa9e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=a9243529fdb7e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190a RCRD)
If you filed a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, and it has been longer than 90 days since you filed and you haven't gotten an update from us within the last 60 days, and have not seen any public notice that addresses your case type, please don't wait the extra 30 days. Call customer service immediately.
wallpaper smith is Birthday Greeting
immi_enthu
08-10 06:38 PM
why the delay even in saying to wait for 90 days ?
nrk
11-02 12:31 PM
It is a good sign for sure.
I don't know about F/P notice, but for sure it can not be RFE
i believe pre-adjudication does not even show on the status.
It is a good sign, you are still in the system!!
(1) It is most likely 2nd F/P notice or an RFE. It could mean that your case is being pre-adjudicated.
I don't know about F/P notice, but for sure it can not be RFE
i believe pre-adjudication does not even show on the status.
It is a good sign, you are still in the system!!
(1) It is most likely 2nd F/P notice or an RFE. It could mean that your case is being pre-adjudicated.
2011 happy irthday wishes lover.
nsd786
01-17 05:11 PM
My PD is Oct 2004 .Received I-140 RFE Ability to pay.RFE date Jan 2nd 2009.They have asked for Tax returns for 2006 and 2007 (2004 and 2005 were submitted during filing).They have mentioned that we also have the option to submit W2 ,Audited statements or Annual reports.The company is a small company with 20-30 employees and is doing pretty well .For 2004 ,2005 and 2006 their net incomes is about 3-4 times my proffered wage.But there is an issue for the 2007 return.Their year ends in June and hence 2007 return was due on September 2007 for which they have filed an extension.Hence returns are not due till March 2009.RFE has to be responded to by Feb 2nd.They have paid an estimated tax of about 34000-35000 .My proffered wages are 52000.Hence if one calculates the estimated income it is in line with the previous years and is about 3 times my wages.But there is no return only extension notice and proof of taxes paid .I do not work for them right now and have no W2.They do not have any audited statement or annual report.I am trying to get them to give me a statement from their CPA stating estimated revenues,net income and tax for 2007 but I am being given the run around.If I were to submit only with the 2006 return and 2007 extension filed with proof of tax paid is it OK or do i most definitely need that letter from their CPA.I doubt I can get anything more than the CPA letter and that too is doubtful.Business owner perceives CPA letter not needed attorney states needed.I am in a limbo.Please help .Do I also need statement showing income from July 2008 through December 2008 to show current ability to pay as advised when they have asked only for 2006 and 2007 returns.PLEEEASE HELLP AND GIVE YOR ADVISE.
more...
engineer
12-11 08:13 PM
See below for introduction to Immigrationvoice.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16034
Many provisions which will help all of us have chance to get into OMNIBUS bill in Senate between now and Feb. Read more about OMNIBUS bill at http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15745
For this IV urgently needs close to 30k for lobbying efforts. We have collected 27k so far.
I am coordinating campaign for WI. Please see action item below and I will really appreciate your support and prompt response.
Three immediate Action items:
1. Contribute now even 25$ would do.
See http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=44
2. Be part of IV: To get, inside updates, share what you want us to do, please become member of WI State Chapter of IV. Send me your non-ge email.
3. Reach out: Send this message to atleast 5 people (and cc me) who are facing Green Card delays and have them talk to me directly.
I understand everyone can not go out and protest and meet Congressman/ woman/ Senators but I am certain that these 3 action items can be done very easily.
thanks,
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16034
Many provisions which will help all of us have chance to get into OMNIBUS bill in Senate between now and Feb. Read more about OMNIBUS bill at http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15745
For this IV urgently needs close to 30k for lobbying efforts. We have collected 27k so far.
I am coordinating campaign for WI. Please see action item below and I will really appreciate your support and prompt response.
Three immediate Action items:
1. Contribute now even 25$ would do.
See http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=44
2. Be part of IV: To get, inside updates, share what you want us to do, please become member of WI State Chapter of IV. Send me your non-ge email.
3. Reach out: Send this message to atleast 5 people (and cc me) who are facing Green Card delays and have them talk to me directly.
I understand everyone can not go out and protest and meet Congressman/ woman/ Senators but I am certain that these 3 action items can be done very easily.
thanks,
kevinkris
06-24 08:40 PM
I am in same boat..
Donno what to do..
But after all my research, it's better to work with that employer A for say 1 or 2 years or if possible until you get GC for sometime and then move..
Since the PD is Mar 2005, hopefully you will get with in a year or year and half..
Good luck..
Other possibility is use EAD to work with Company A and also do part-time but you will loose H1 status.. which is scary..
Hi
my GC is applied for future employment by company A on july2007.I did concurrent filing of 140 and 485.My I-140 approved on Feb 2008 and waiting for 485 approval. My PD belongs to 2005 mar EB2.
I am still working with my old company B .
My question is Am i eligible to change company C
without working for company A( My GC sponsored company).Can I file AC21 without working for GC sponsored company? Please i need somebody advice.
Thanks,
David
Donno what to do..
But after all my research, it's better to work with that employer A for say 1 or 2 years or if possible until you get GC for sometime and then move..
Since the PD is Mar 2005, hopefully you will get with in a year or year and half..
Good luck..
Other possibility is use EAD to work with Company A and also do part-time but you will loose H1 status.. which is scary..
Hi
my GC is applied for future employment by company A on july2007.I did concurrent filing of 140 and 485.My I-140 approved on Feb 2008 and waiting for 485 approval. My PD belongs to 2005 mar EB2.
I am still working with my old company B .
My question is Am i eligible to change company C
without working for company A( My GC sponsored company).Can I file AC21 without working for GC sponsored company? Please i need somebody advice.
Thanks,
David
more...
fasterthanlight�
05-14 03:08 AM
Bahahah, I like it, but the "c" could be a little more pronounced.
2010 irthday greetings for lover
gcnotfiledyet
06-24 12:17 PM
This service will provide fast track program to reach heaven (or hell dependent if you have GC or not) as well. Anyone interested? :D
more...
ragool25
08-30 05:36 PM
Thanks mhathi for your response.
How long ( no of days) does the USCIS California center takes to decide the case for Fresh H1( F1- H1) RFE after requested documents were submitted before deadline under premium processing category.
How long ( no of days) does the USCIS California center takes to decide the case for Fresh H1( F1- H1) RFE after requested documents were submitted before deadline under premium processing category.
hair Card Birthday Greeting
GCBy3000
07-08 10:06 AM
It is illegal if the part time employer paid you directly. However, I believe it would not be illegal if you were paid by one employer.
Example : Working for employer A on his payroll. ( COnsulting)
Consulting for B - fulltime
Consulting for C - Partime
Both pay your consulting company and that company pay you through single pay roll. Will this be illegal? I am not sure. By the way, I did not do this, but it came across my mind.
Folks, can security check uncover unauthorized part time work whiles on H1. Will this be reported to USCIS? If so will that be a basis for denial for a green card? Any information or precedence?
Example : Working for employer A on his payroll. ( COnsulting)
Consulting for B - fulltime
Consulting for C - Partime
Both pay your consulting company and that company pay you through single pay roll. Will this be illegal? I am not sure. By the way, I did not do this, but it came across my mind.
Folks, can security check uncover unauthorized part time work whiles on H1. Will this be reported to USCIS? If so will that be a basis for denial for a green card? Any information or precedence?
more...
snathan
04-16 04:01 PM
Back in 1982, when I left the INS to enter private practice, the number of H-1 visas was unlimited. All professionals, including registered nurses, were eligible for H-1 visas. Also, there was no maximum duration for H-1s. U.S. employers could petition for H-1 workers all year long, yet the program did not generate the amount of controversy that it does today. It was a market-based system which allowed U.S. employers to fill jobs in a global economy, plain and simple. The Immigration Act of 1990 ushered in the present era of government control of �H-1B� temporary visas. For the first...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/04/h-1bs-let-the-market-decide-the-number-of-working-visas.html)
Thanks a lot Mr.Shusterman. We need more people like you to make our voice heard.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/04/h-1bs-let-the-market-decide-the-number-of-working-visas.html)
Thanks a lot Mr.Shusterman. We need more people like you to make our voice heard.
hot Birthday Wishes To Lover.
grinch
06-24 07:53 PM
Ah!
Haha I was thinking about that one! Thanks for clearing it up!
Haha I was thinking about that one! Thanks for clearing it up!
more...
house funny irthday wishes for
somegchuh
10-29 05:37 PM
Since there are lot of ppl here who have had EAD/AP for years ...
Do you know if USCIS lets you petition for renewal of EAD/AP only 4 months before expiry? Our legal assistant says that they can not apply for renewal until its 4 months to expiry. I was under the impression that we could apply six months in advance. Can someone post a USCIS link that provides a definitive answer?
Thanks
Do you know if USCIS lets you petition for renewal of EAD/AP only 4 months before expiry? Our legal assistant says that they can not apply for renewal until its 4 months to expiry. I was under the impression that we could apply six months in advance. Can someone post a USCIS link that provides a definitive answer?
Thanks
tattoo girlfriend wishes for lovers
tnite
10-04 04:28 PM
Hi Tnite,
Thank you for your reply.
...but only in Adjustment of status, what does it meaning?
what it means is that once she uses her EAD , she is in AOS.Then she can work for her own company .
Thank you for your reply.
...but only in Adjustment of status, what does it meaning?
what it means is that once she uses her EAD , she is in AOS.Then she can work for her own company .
more...
pictures hair Birthday Poems For Lover.
dealsnet
06-03 10:49 AM
Send RFE reply with USCIS approved doctor's letter to explain the details. Only medical expert can comment about the vaccine. No one can impose vaccine if it is not appropriate with the age.
I am posting this on behalf of a friend. They (husband/wife) got their green card approval last week, however they got 2 RFEs for their 2 kids. The RFE is about a vaccine called PNEUMOCOCCAL (PCV/PPV) that's not been administered for the kids. The RFE mentions the requirement for this vaccine but the doctor deemed it as NOT-AGE-APPROPRIATE in their filed medical forms.
Our guess is that when they actually administered the vaccine about a year or so ago, it was deemed "Not age appropriate" but now upon approval, the USCIS deems it necessary. I'd appreciate it if anybody with similar experience can post as to how they handled the situation or any insights into who to talk to is also much appreciated. The family is currently not in the country and therefore their options are limited in terms of talking to or meeting someone face to face. Also they need to respond to the RFE by June 24.
Thanks.
I am posting this on behalf of a friend. They (husband/wife) got their green card approval last week, however they got 2 RFEs for their 2 kids. The RFE is about a vaccine called PNEUMOCOCCAL (PCV/PPV) that's not been administered for the kids. The RFE mentions the requirement for this vaccine but the doctor deemed it as NOT-AGE-APPROPRIATE in their filed medical forms.
Our guess is that when they actually administered the vaccine about a year or so ago, it was deemed "Not age appropriate" but now upon approval, the USCIS deems it necessary. I'd appreciate it if anybody with similar experience can post as to how they handled the situation or any insights into who to talk to is also much appreciated. The family is currently not in the country and therefore their options are limited in terms of talking to or meeting someone face to face. Also they need to respond to the RFE by June 24.
Thanks.
dresses Birthday Wishes Lover.
485Question
09-18 12:32 PM
Feeling bad for not making it. Looking forward to see our heros pics and videos
Live
http://dcrally.blogspot.com/2007/09/live-photo.html
Live
http://dcrally.blogspot.com/2007/09/live-photo.html
more...
makeup Birthday Wishes Jar
Onesimus
02-26 02:20 AM
@NyteStarNyne & Kirupa : Thanks :)
girlfriend irthday poems for lovers.
LostInGCProcess
02-05 02:50 PM
I meant to ask about a turks & caicos visa. It is a british overseas territory but doesn't seem to require a visa from anyone.
You may not need a visa to visit those British territories....but, you need a visa or AP or GC to enter US. Once you have gone there for visiting (or any other purpose), you have crossed the international border of US.
You may not need a visa to visit those British territories....but, you need a visa or AP or GC to enter US. Once you have gone there for visiting (or any other purpose), you have crossed the international border of US.
hairstyles irthday quotes for lover.
techbuyer77
09-24 08:50 AM
Thanks for the response div. I did think it was too good to be true. It is.
ssn for green card holders is without restrictions, It does not have any banner on them
ssn for green card holders is without restrictions, It does not have any banner on them
Blog Feeds
06-24 04:30 PM
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/tatoo.jpg
Yesterday I went to a training for immigration attorneys in Sacramento, California. The jurisdiction of the USCIS field office in Sacramento (https://egov.uscis.gov/crisgwi/go?action=offices.detail&office=SAC&OfficeLocator.office_type=LO&OfficeLocator.statecode=CA) includes the cities of Vallejo and Benicia so I thought it might be useful to hear about any new local procedures. While I did not learn anything new about what is happening at Sacramento USCIS, I did learn about new procedures being applied to applicants applying for visas abroad.
It seems that applicants who have tattoos are being screened more carefully at their medical appointments. The belief is that an individual with a tatoo may be involved in gang activity which furthermore may lead to that individual engaging in substance abuse. In a published article included in conference materials at the American Immigration Lawyers Association�s (�AILA (http://www.aila.org/)�) annual conference, immigration lawyers Fernando Rojas and Magda Montiel Davis, explain what is happening:
Panel physicians are asking applicants about the meaning of their tattoos and the medical personnel conducting the exam will take notes describing the tattoo. This interrogation could lead to further questions about the applicant�s possible gang affiliation and criminal history. Applicants with tattoos are also being questioned by the panel physician regarding their substance abuse history. Apparently, panel physicians are making the assumption that applicants with tattoos are more likely to do or abuse drugs. If the beneficiary admits to any drug use, Consulates will use this information against the applicant in order to deny the visa by making a substance abuse finding against them.A finding of substance abuse is serious because an applicant who is a drug user or abuser may be denied admission to the United States pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(a)(1)(A)(iv) (http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVAP.jsp?dockey=9b60c646835045a30ceca097f0ca1 ba3). I would counsel anyone carefully who has a tattoo to be very honest about what the tattoo means. An applicant should be prepared to answer in- depth questions about something that may have been inconsequential to them. In my opinion, it would not be a bad idea to have the tattoo removed if possible. Of course the fact that a person has a tattoo does not mean that he or she is a substance abuser. It is scary that examiners are making that assumption, but I do not expect this scrutiny to go away. The best practice is to be aware that this questioning is taking place and to be prepared.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/06/it_only_takes_a_tatoo.html)
Yesterday I went to a training for immigration attorneys in Sacramento, California. The jurisdiction of the USCIS field office in Sacramento (https://egov.uscis.gov/crisgwi/go?action=offices.detail&office=SAC&OfficeLocator.office_type=LO&OfficeLocator.statecode=CA) includes the cities of Vallejo and Benicia so I thought it might be useful to hear about any new local procedures. While I did not learn anything new about what is happening at Sacramento USCIS, I did learn about new procedures being applied to applicants applying for visas abroad.
It seems that applicants who have tattoos are being screened more carefully at their medical appointments. The belief is that an individual with a tatoo may be involved in gang activity which furthermore may lead to that individual engaging in substance abuse. In a published article included in conference materials at the American Immigration Lawyers Association�s (�AILA (http://www.aila.org/)�) annual conference, immigration lawyers Fernando Rojas and Magda Montiel Davis, explain what is happening:
Panel physicians are asking applicants about the meaning of their tattoos and the medical personnel conducting the exam will take notes describing the tattoo. This interrogation could lead to further questions about the applicant�s possible gang affiliation and criminal history. Applicants with tattoos are also being questioned by the panel physician regarding their substance abuse history. Apparently, panel physicians are making the assumption that applicants with tattoos are more likely to do or abuse drugs. If the beneficiary admits to any drug use, Consulates will use this information against the applicant in order to deny the visa by making a substance abuse finding against them.A finding of substance abuse is serious because an applicant who is a drug user or abuser may be denied admission to the United States pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(a)(1)(A)(iv) (http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVAP.jsp?dockey=9b60c646835045a30ceca097f0ca1 ba3). I would counsel anyone carefully who has a tattoo to be very honest about what the tattoo means. An applicant should be prepared to answer in- depth questions about something that may have been inconsequential to them. In my opinion, it would not be a bad idea to have the tattoo removed if possible. Of course the fact that a person has a tattoo does not mean that he or she is a substance abuser. It is scary that examiners are making that assumption, but I do not expect this scrutiny to go away. The best practice is to be aware that this questioning is taking place and to be prepared.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/06/it_only_takes_a_tatoo.html)
bhatt
05-21 11:31 AM
Hello,
Here's my situation:
H1b: 7th Year (valid through Nov 2009)
Labor: Approved
140: Approved
Category: EB2
Priority Date: Aug 2007
485/EAD: cannot file due to retrogression
I have a permanent employment offer from the employer where I am contracting, right now for the same job. Following are the questions I have:
1. Can I change my employer?
2. Can I retain my Priority date?
3. If the new employer files for transfer of H1, what does it mean to my extension beyond 7th year?
Please help.
Thank you.
U need to start the GC process all over again, unless ur current employer is willing to support you in filing the I-485 without revoking the I-140
Here's my situation:
H1b: 7th Year (valid through Nov 2009)
Labor: Approved
140: Approved
Category: EB2
Priority Date: Aug 2007
485/EAD: cannot file due to retrogression
I have a permanent employment offer from the employer where I am contracting, right now for the same job. Following are the questions I have:
1. Can I change my employer?
2. Can I retain my Priority date?
3. If the new employer files for transfer of H1, what does it mean to my extension beyond 7th year?
Please help.
Thank you.
U need to start the GC process all over again, unless ur current employer is willing to support you in filing the I-485 without revoking the I-140
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar